USA World War 3: US vs. China & Russia Together. Who Wins ?

America is a global power with global interests. Its military is tasked first and foremost with defending America from attack. Beyond that, it must be capable of protecting Americans abroad, allies, and the freedom to use international sea, air, and space while retaining the ability to engage in more than one major contingency at a time. America must be able not only to defend itself and its interests, but also to deter enemies and opportunists from taking action that would challenge U.S. interests, a capability that includes both preventing the destabilization of a region and guarding against threats to the peace and security of America’s friends.

As noted in the five preceding editions of the Index, however, the U.S. does not have the necessary force to meet a two–major regional contingency (two-MRC) requirement and is not ready to carry out its duties effectively. Consequently, as we have seen during the past few years, the U.S. risks seeing its interests increasingly challenged and the world order it has led since World War II undone.
How to Think About Sizing Military Power

Military power begins with the people and equipment used to conduct war: the weapons, tanks, ships, airplanes, and supporting tools such as communications systems that make it possible either for one group to impose its will on another or to prevent such an outcome from happening.

However, simply counting the number of people, tanks, or combat aircraft that the U.S. possesses would be insufficient because it would lack context. For example, the U.S. Army might have 100 tanks, but to accomplish a specific military task, 1,000 or more might be needed or none at all. It might be that the terrain on which a battle is fought is especially ill-suited to tanks or that the tanks one has are inferior to the enemy’s. The enemy could be quite adept at using tanks, or his tank operations might be integrated into a larger employment concept that leverages the supporting fires of infantry and airpower, whereas one’s own tanks are poorly maintained, the crews are not well-prepared, or one’s doctrine is irrelevant.

Success in war is partly a function of matching the tools of warfare to a specific task and employing those tools effectively in battle. Get these wrong—tools, objective, competence, or context—and you lose.

Another key element is the military’s capacity to conduct operations: how many of the right tools—people, tanks, planes, or ships—it has. One might have the right tools and know how to use them effectively but not have enough to win. Given that one cannot know with certainty beforehand just when, where, against whom, and for what reason a battle might be fought, determining how much capability is needed is an exercise of informed but not certain judgment.

Trọng lú wins! No more Tàu "lạ" harassed VN fishmen in SouthEast Sea. No worries about handing VN to China as promised in 1948 by TT Pham văn Đồng! VN Communist party continues to terrorize their People and rob them in the day light without worrying about getting sued or punished by the big guy Du Ết A.

it never happen, mấy thằng lớn sẽ không đụng nhau , họ chỉ xúi mấy thằng nhỏ đục nhau để bán vũ khí trục lợi

Trận này thực sự xảy ra thì chắc coi sướng rên... "mé đìu hiu" à nha....
Uýnh trước tháng 11 được không ta? Vậy mới nhộn nhịp chứ.

sao lai co co my trong nay nua vay troi.

bài viết này đọc chơi cho giết thời gian chứ không có thực tế tại vì khi chiến tranh thế giới thứ ba mà diễn ra thì phải tính luôn Tây Phương, Úc, Canada, Nhật, etc...đây là những nước đồng minh U.S mà lực lượng tác chiến cũng không thể bỏ qua được.
Đừng nghe những gì thổ tả nói mà hãy nhìn kỷ những gì bọn thổ tả đã và đang làm> Đây là slogan của vinhduong68 để lại cho bọn thổ tả con cháu sau này mà học hỏi, đừng có vướng mắc vào lỗi lầm của cha/ ông chúng nó ăn cơm quốc gia thờ ma XHCN.