VietBF - View Single Post - Rabbit R1 có thể sớm thay thế cho điện thoại thông minh

trungthuc · 04-03-2024

Hi vọng không phải là dạng"cá tháng 4" thường nghe thấy mỗi năm!!

Nên vô trang Rabbit để tham khảo thêm ở đây:
- https://www.rabbit.tech/

hoặc ở đây:
- https://www.techradar.com/computing/...-the-rabbit-r1

Có lẽ phải chờ cho đến khi thiết bị này được review đầy đủ thì chúng ta mới nên quyết định mua xài thử hay khong6vi2 thấy giá cả không cao, nhiều điểm còn mập mờ, không biết trụ sở chính của nó ở đâu.?

Dưới đây là 1 nhận định của đọc giả trên Reddit cách đây 3 tháng về thiết bị này (tiếng Anh)

FlashingBongos
•
3mo ago
I saw the intro video and I have a few thoughts.

I don't see why this will replace your phone. He mentioned that the old, app-based way of interacting with services was introduced around 15 years ago and the new era of native AI-powered devices are just getting started... But I don't see why you can't introduce native AI-powered devices into a smartphone already? We've already had primitive on-device AI things like Siri, Alexa, Google Assistant etc. If they can be enhanced to take action then what's the point of this?

In terms of security, I did like the fact that you'll be redirected to the company's login for authentication but I don't see how that's any better than an app. The rabbitOS cloud platform just seems to act as a proxy for the service itself. Sure I guess you can argue it's all "in one area" but is that worth $200? Definitely not for me.

I also don't see how/why the existing voice assistants today such as Siri or Google Assistant can't easily just do this. They are embedded into your phone's operating system and, assuming some privacy/security issues are resolved, they can get full access to all your interactions. He mentions GPT agents and now you're forcing a generalized model into doing something specific isn't what the model is for. I think as long as the model can get your job done I don't think most people will care what it's meant for. GPT agents (and AI as a whole) is accelerating and I assume by end of 2024/early 2025 it will be in a pretty good state.

The demo shows a lot of features that can already be done today by voice assistants. Looking up stock price, taking a snapshot of an image and doing analysis on it, asking questions, listening to music from different music streaming services, ordering food, booking a flight, etc. The only difference I see is that you need some user confirmation to act on it. I agree that's the main selling point of this product but I seriously doubt people will pay $200 for something like this AND trust a brand new company with this. Imagine you want to book a flight and it books the wrong destination or something. User-based confirmation at least puts the fault on the user.

And the absolute biggest issue with me is the hardware itself. You'll be carrying another device - and that too a pretty chunky one. If it was smaller or somehow more portable then it might be OK. But the device is a thick square and most people will not want two devices in their pockets / purse. I just don't see how this is a companion. It's trying to be a smartphone without the calling/texting features. I'd argue the word smartphone is badly named in today's world but that's a separate topic (maybe electronic companion is better?).

Overall I don't see this product getting very far. There might be a small user base that likes it but I don't see how this will appeal to the masses. However I am intrigued by their research and will be following them closely.

04-03-2024	#2
trungthuc R8 Võ Lâm Chí Tôn Join Date: Jul 2020 Location: California Posts: 11,828 Thanks: 415 Thanked 6,074 Times in 3,717 Posts Mentioned: 18 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 391 Post(s) Rep Power: 33	Hi vọng không phải là dạng"cá tháng 4" thường nghe thấy mỗi năm!! Nên vô trang Rabbit để tham khảo thêm ở đây: - https://www.rabbit.tech/ hoặc ở đây: - https://www.techradar.com/computing/...-the-rabbit-r1 Có lẽ phải chờ cho đến khi thiết bị này được review đầy đủ thì chúng ta mới nên quyết định mua xài thử hay khong6vi2 thấy giá cả không cao, nhiều điểm còn mập mờ, không biết trụ sở chính của nó ở đâu.? Dưới đây là 1 nhận định của đọc giả trên Reddit cách đây 3 tháng về thiết bị này (tiếng Anh) FlashingBongos • 3mo ago I saw the intro video and I have a few thoughts. I don't see why this will replace your phone. He mentioned that the old, app-based way of interacting with services was introduced around 15 years ago and the new era of native AI-powered devices are just getting started... But I don't see why you can't introduce native AI-powered devices into a smartphone already? We've already had primitive on-device AI things like Siri, Alexa, Google Assistant etc. If they can be enhanced to take action then what's the point of this? In terms of security, I did like the fact that you'll be redirected to the company's login for authentication but I don't see how that's any better than an app. The rabbitOS cloud platform just seems to act as a proxy for the service itself. Sure I guess you can argue it's all "in one area" but is that worth $200? Definitely not for me. I also don't see how/why the existing voice assistants today such as Siri or Google Assistant can't easily just do this. They are embedded into your phone's operating system and, assuming some privacy/security issues are resolved, they can get full access to all your interactions. He mentions GPT agents and now you're forcing a generalized model into doing something specific isn't what the model is for. I think as long as the model can get your job done I don't think most people will care what it's meant for. GPT agents (and AI as a whole) is accelerating and I assume by end of 2024/early 2025 it will be in a pretty good state. The demo shows a lot of features that can already be done today by voice assistants. Looking up stock price, taking a snapshot of an image and doing analysis on it, asking questions, listening to music from different music streaming services, ordering food, booking a flight, etc. The only difference I see is that you need some user confirmation to act on it. I agree that's the main selling point of this product but I seriously doubt people will pay $200 for something like this AND trust a brand new company with this. Imagine you want to book a flight and it books the wrong destination or something. User-based confirmation at least puts the fault on the user. And the absolute biggest issue with me is the hardware itself. You'll be carrying another device - and that too a pretty chunky one. If it was smaller or somehow more portable then it might be OK. But the device is a thick square and most people will not want two devices in their pockets / purse. I just don't see how this is a companion. It's trying to be a smartphone without the calling/texting features. I'd argue the word smartphone is badly named in today's world but that's a separate topic (maybe electronic companion is better?). Overall I don't see this product getting very far. There might be a small user base that likes it but I don't see how this will appeal to the masses. However I am intrigued by their research and will be following them closely. Last edited by trungthuc; 04-03-2024 at 16:21.